Is Advertising Harmful? Essay

For many years when it started, manise was a divine gift to the mass media. It embodied the epitome of information freeway during the time when it was starting as it completely(a)owed consumers to get information about products and work at the comfort of their homes, while reading the newspaper for instance, or by chance while watching the television or listening to the radio. Advertisers, however, were non mental object on how they stinker reach consumers and thus initiated slipway in ensuring that both centavo they spend in publicise lead pay off and win consumers to purchase.Competition alike grew as time passed by and today on that point ar too many options for consumers to choose from. This put pressure in the advertisers. The need to sell pushed them to find ways to sell. Oftentimes, the advertize is the best culture medium to do so given the wide reach and reception that it has. This all led to the harmful effects that many scholars and researchers claim t hat advertising has. The harms of advertising can be found in its effects in the media, economy, in children and families, and human behavior in public.For hotshot, the media has become advertiser-driven. While before the medias thrust is to entertain and inform its audiences, it has now become a secretaire of information of advertisers, their products, and their services. Many shows, in fact, fork out now been created for the benefit of advertisers and to development their selling points. There be television programs as well that atomic number 18 created entirely to market a single product, which creates monopoly against products who do not have the capacity such as finances to produce such advertising shows.Economically, this subtle monopoly has lead many small businesses to close down and tho empower the primacy of the larger competitors. (Harms and Kellner, n. d. ) These harmful effects atomic number 18 further validate by the intrusion and repetitiveness of advertisem ents. From the time angiotensin converting enzyme wakes up, eats, rides to work or school, and goes back home to sleep, he is bombarded with advertiser information. Even going to the public restroom is not an exception ever since loo ads became a orbicular trend. (Harms and Kellner, n. d. ) Even the telephone has become an avenue for advertisers.Not only one among many have been caught by telemarketers during dinner, or notwithstanding during Sunday lunch. The best occasion about this is that employment increased, despite the turnover, in telemarketing. The bad thing is that this type of advertising is intrusive and unethical. Even private email addresses are testimonies to the intrusion that advertisers will waive for the sake of trying to sell. Children are as well among the most affected by the harms of advertising. According to Dittman (2004), an average child is loose to 40,000 advertising materials annually.This figure includes all television commercials alone. There ar e early(a) advertisements aired over the radio, in printed materials, and in fact wherever one looks. Even the schools have welcomed advertisers in campuses, though many institutions stay on the watch on the advertisers and advertisements that they allow. Furthermore, studies show that just one exposure to an advertisement, especially in children, can make a register in the brain and even out entice buying. This can influence children and adults as well to shop impulsively which has greatly affected consumerism and private lives across the globe.For many instances, children will also nag their parents into buying them things that they saw in advertisements, or for money to buy these things. Even habits can be altered. Studies show that a childs eating behavior can change drastically when exposed to cast aside food ads. Exposure to dust food ads alongside healthy food ads is not a solution as well, for children will remember junk food ads more. (Dittman, 2004) In an effort to combat these effects, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychological Association, and Kaiser Family Foundation has lead many organizations who are after stricter regulations in advertising.The proponents enjoin groups with the similar vision and mission to create and propose ways to protect the society, highlighting on children, against the harmful effects of advertising. Stricter laws, proper monitoring, regulate bodies, and proper education are among the things viewed to solve the dilemma. (Dittman, 2004) Adult supervision is some other thing to appeal for. Today, with kids having private access to the internet, television, radio, and reading materials in their bedrooms or schools, away from the eyes of their parents, they are put into a situation where they are not guided.In such cases, they receive information as facts and even if there is a chance for them to weigh amongst right and wrong, mingled with positive and negative, there is more probability that the influe nce that is imprinted on them will affect them. If the advertisement is negative, then the effect will equally be negative. (Dittman, 2004) Yet not all advertisements are intrusive and harmful. (Harms and Keller, n. d. ) There are advertisements that show good behavior and influence people towards the positive.If at all always harmful, many advertisers downplay the bad knowing that audiences will not buy products which have negative impressions on them. (Harmful effects of advertising can be indirect, delayed, and cumulative, n. d. ) This care that advertisers take helps them increase their sales more profoundly. However, it is pipe down a fact that advertising affects the human behavior in general and radiates these effects to their families and to the society ultimately. Advertising is a big leap for the mass media, and it is wrong to eliminate advertising at this point, even if it is torn between the good and the bad.The right thing to do would be to subdue these advertisements and adjudge the information positive and varied. A good look at psychology, economics, and communication industries will also help. In the end, good advertisers win the game.References Dittman M. 2004. Protecting children from advertising http//www. apa. org/monitor/jun04/protecting. html Harmful effects of advertising can be indirect, delayed, and cumulative. n. d. http//www. uta. edu/huma/illuminations/kell6. htm Harms, J. and Kellner, D. n. d. Toward a critical theory of advertising. http//webserve. govst. edu/pa/Advertising/ABCs/harmful. htm.