Humorists in Society Essay

Humorists have compete a substantial part in any society for as long as every 1(a) can remember. Whether its your commonplace, light-hearted comic or the one whos trying to rebel and prove a authentic train with humor, there will al charges be someone idolizing them. For instance, in his entertain Status Anxiety, Alain De Botton decl bed that humorists play an absolute rattling role in our society beca phthisis they are able to avoid otherwise dour consequences. eon I believe that Bottons logic is correct in many examples such as television comics and editorial cartoonists, there are excessively just as many other examples to prove how humorists are non completely vital.Television comedians do indeed avoid consequences by covering their underlying message with humor. A perfect example is the crew and hosts of Saturday night Live. They are able to successfully take real life scenarios and duck them into their carefully planned skits, whether its about Barack Obama, oth er political figures, or any number of controversial current events the cast and crew are able to dodge any repercussions beca subroutine of their humorous effect. Not only do people use shows like Saturday Night Live as empty entertainment, further, if I have to guess, a lot of people also hold back up gaining valuable knowledge about what may be mishap around the world. This assumption could be used to support Bottons living point, considering many people dont watch the news or make an effort to learn about current events, so one could conclude that these comical television shows are vital to society in order to act as a news casting show. duration this might make sense initi all toldy, it also helps disprove Bottons opinion. Because these shows use humor to get their point across, it is also skewing what actually may be happening for comical purposes, so while people may be gaining knowledge, theyre actually gaining a biased, misrepresented view to the situation.Among the m any types of humorists include with the television comics, editorial cartoonists are yet another prominent company who use humor to represent current events, without being penalized for their controversial views. These cartoonists use visual stimuli to provoke a laugh from their viewers they distort the bearing of people, recount sensitive issues in a entertaining way, and use subliminal messages to get their opinion out tothe common. Many of these editorial cartoonists arent penalized because they provide their work to an online board anonymously or they already have a superior reputation where nobody wants to create a dispute with them, still furthermore, these cartoonists arent penalized because the way they depict these events are within a common agreement of their viewers.Now there may be a superfluity of types of humorists who dont receive repercussions, but contrary to Alain de Bottons reasoning, humorists are not absolutely necessary to our society. They may be able to successfully reach the public in an entertaining way to promote local situations, however, humorists are not the only type of people who act to spreading their opinions. Granted, humorists may be the only ones who dont receive consequence, but activists, editorial columnists, and certain types of criminals all act in the same way many humorists do advocating their opinions to the public. Activists create campaigns, go on strikes, and create public awareness to a certain incident editorial columnists skillfully compile a column and post it for anyone on the internet to access certain criminals even commit their crimes in order to rebel against an unjust law. These examples all disprove Bottons reasoning, humorists arent vital because there will always be other people creating a public awareness to whatsoever may be inequitable.According to author Alain de Botton, humorists play a vital function in our society because they are able to say things that otherwise may be dangerous o r impossible to say directly, as stated in his 2004 book, Status Anxiety. I personally believe his logic has its faults and strengths while television comics and cartoonists may avoid these dangerous consequences, they are not the only ones to promote current events to the public, such as activists and editorial columnists. scarcely regardless, it is well known by everyone how humorists have made a great contribution to society for ages.