The Rhetorical Presidency Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The Rhetorical Presidency - Essay ExampleHe managed not solitary(prenominal) to rescue his presidency but also instill national moral revival which had been diminishing. Now it has become a common phenomenon in contemporary leadership. The propagation of Rhetoric Presidency Throughout the 19th Century, rhetoric presidency was received with a lot of suspicion and presidents rarely attempted to directly communicate to the people. compensate the few speeches delivered by presidents were totally different from the ones delivered today. They were mostly concerned with constitutional matters, patriotism or conduct of war as opposed to todays domestic policy speeches aimed at moving the nations conscience. In the modern times however, presidents have come to believe that they are not effective presidents if they cannot be commensurate to exhort the public. It is now common for presidents to make press conferences, radio or TV coverage speeches, news releases or congressional address eve ry so often. These speeches have a common tone to them, i.e. Speaking is governing, (Ceaser, 159), and are aimed at exhibiting the publics reaction as if to a real situation. ... President Nixon was sensitive of the publics reaction to a lot of rhetoric and came up with his own anti-rhetoric promising to stop it, but the president could not even hold himself from shouting back at his detractors. And of course there was President Carter who at first was all calm promising to bring sanity back to regime but by the mid of his term his speeches were all full of rhetorical forcefulness talking of the decline and revitalization of the country. But what are the implications of these rhetoric speeches that almost all the contemporary presidents find themselves caught into? The Rhetoric Presidency Pulpit Bully or Mere Baloney? Many people term these speeches as innocent rhetoric and they know that its all talk. But despite the knowledge of this fact, the excess speeches have continued t o inflate peoples expectations to the detriment of these leaders. This has certain into an institutional dilemma for all the modern governments. These presidents are expected to match their actions with the ideals they created in the publics mind through their rhetoric speeches. In the end, it is their government that is weakened by this kind of leadership since it is hard to measure up to the peoples puffed up expectations. With failure comes criticism and cynicism from the same people they sought to impress. When George scrubbing was asked about his most disappointing experience in leadership, he admitted that he was not a bully communicator. Clinton too wished he had done a good job in communicating to the public according to what he could achieve, (Edwards, 20). So is the presidents office exactly a bully pulpit as Roosevelt described it? Most modern