'Harrison Bergeron Essay\r'

'Kurt Vonnegut’s fictitious companionship adopted the theories of Social produce and Social Justice to establish a new social and legal order. The mountain amended the constitution to attain comparison for all. With the amendments, they created practice of laws to adjudge a uniform citizenry out of their people and in the bear on stripped them of their individuality. These laws were also intended to take form them think and act alike which was their view of equality. As to who is benefited from such positive magnetic declination of social control depends on whose bandstand it was coming from. Despite their unrestricted freedoms no wholeness was ultimately benefited in this mannikin of formation.\r\nIt was no guarantee of peace and implicit control, as in the case of Harrison. His corporal and mental states were no match for the handicaps. formerly both powers were unleashed and unrestrained what resulted was a intermingle and coordination that produced a b eautiful symphony of spring and music. It was symbolical of the good things that can reach or that can be achieved if we permit our natural gifts, talents and skills work for the common good. thither can be unity in diversity and peaceful co-existence may be possible. In a controlled decree as this sham one, there were no norms, values, and civilisation that may identify them.\r\nFor norms, values and gloss were what will set them apart. This was a robotic society where the norms were that which are forced upon them because of the handicaps several(prenominal) were make to wear. Acceptable norms were absent because the standard (equality) was build into the system. In effect one had a common standard to follow in which to comport oneself, no less and no better that the others. There was alone one value that stood, no one was higher up the other in appearance and in the treatment he gave and he got. elaboration should define who and what this society was, besides what wo uld make it truly unique?\r\nThere was zilch neither appealing nor interesting in it because everything went against the natural ways of man. People followed rules not out of their volition. How were they to know the good was twist bad, and worse was turning worst, if something in their brains signaled a censure. This restraint was basically against their good and benefit, but they had no choice but to result what was programmed in their system. Once, this was a society that had reached the utmost(prenominal) end of the balance with their all-out freedoms and unrestrained undecomposeds of individuals.\r\nThe situation had reached unmanageable proportion that they had to quicken to dramatic crisis control which brought them to the other extreme end by way of the invasion on their rights and freedoms. This society took not only the people’s freedoms but their right senses as well. In what they figure to be the correct moves to effect swop, their agitation towards a fre ak of nature was alarming, like when â€Å"some things about living weren’t preferably right … April not being bounce” (Vonnegut, 1961). Law and society have exchangeable attributes.\r\nLaw may change a society and society may change the law. In the case of Harrison Bergeron, society had make 3 amendments to their constitution out of bank for and necessity to change. They wanted to regulate and stay freedoms to a comfortable magnitude. The change in the law made this society a strictly tempered one. Lawyers and the legal system do not have a place in this society whatevermore. The handicapper General proceeded to punish without trial law breakers. The only crime that can be committed was taking one’s handicaps off and that did not need investigating and defense.\r\nThe crime and the criminal are self-evident. The fictional society does not have any direct similarities in today’s time. However, the inference to the curtailment of freedoms is plenty. When a society does not allow an artist to register his heart in his art, the Harrison Bergerons to criticize the political science which should be for, by and of the people, and ease the disquietude of ordinary citizens, they are the translations of Vonnegut’s transgressions of freedoms in his fictional society. Instead of seeking for equality in the extreme, working with diversity cleverness be the better option.\r\n'